Presented by Doru P. Frantescu, founder and CEO of EU Matrix.
Note: the info presented is part of a new dashboard to be launched soon — feel free to contact us for early testing.
Scale of the VdL 2 Commission's legislative push
232 policy initiatives — and counting
167
Proposals already tabled
Pieces of legislation proposed so far
46
In the pipeline
Legislative initiatives planned (as of now)
The "Commission cannot do what national capitals don't allow" narrative is increasingly dated. The Commission has gone against Paris (Mercosur) and Berlin (chemicals & pollution).
Research dive · Commissioner Green Deal positioning
Is the College backing off the Green Deal?
430
statements analysed
Speeches, EP interventions, Green Deal passages
No Commissioner calls for dismantling the framework. But the College splits into four distinct postures — the language has shifted from climate leadership toward competitiveness, simplification, and calibration.
Research dive · four postures in the College
Four postures, 15 Commissioners
4
Active Advocates
Roswall · Ribera · Jørgensen · Kadis
Consistently champion green standards.
3
Strategic Supporters
Von der Leyen · Hoekstra · Lahbib
Back the agenda, frame it through competitiveness + geopolitics.
2
Passive Accepters
Tzitzikostas · Fitto
Administer green-adjacent programmes without advocacy or resistance.
Systematically argue to soften pace, scope or burden.
Research dive · the audience effect
The same Commissioner talks differently at different venues
The gap between a Commissioner's score at environmental conferences and at industry events measures the size of that adjustment.
How to read the score (−2 to +2 scale):+2 strongly championing green ambition ·
+1 supportive ·
0 conditional (accepts goals, argues to soften implementation) ·
−1 critical (argues to reduce scope) ·
−2 opposed (argues to dismantle)
Commissioner
Env. conferences
Industry events
Gap
Ursula von der Leyen
+2.0
+0.2
1.8
Wopke Hoekstra
+1.6
+0.8
0.8
Jessika Roswall
+1.7
+1.2
0.5
Costas Kadis
+1.4
+1.2
0.2
Research dive · how the Green Deal is being justified
Sold as competitiveness — no longer as a climate response
The first von der Leyen Commission built its case on the climate crisis. This one builds it on competitiveness, resilience, independence. Across all 430 statements:
Economy 49%
Climate 32%
Geo 7%
Energy 6%
Social 6%
A policy sold as competitiveness is evaluated against economic outcomes — and becomes harder to defend the moment it imposes costs.
Stakeholders × EU decision-makers — scale of engagement
83,000+ stakeholder interactions
Stakeholders × Commission
21K+
interactions · VdL 2 mandate · until end Feb 2026
Interactions are derived from declared meetings (one meeting with multiple participants generates multiple interactions)
Stakeholders × MEPs
62K+
meeting pairs · 10th Parliament term · until end Feb 2026
662 MEPs engaged
rapporteurs, shadows, committee chairs and rank-and-file
Every one of these meetings is mapped to the files and topics discussed — so we can tell you which organisations have embedded themselves with the actors who shape your dossiers.
Commission side · who stakeholders are actually meeting
The 10 most sought-after Commissioners
Nov 2024 – Feb 2026
#
Commissioner
Portfolio
Score
Commissioner meetings
Cabinet meetings
Unique stakeholders
1
Stéphane Séjourné
Industrial Strategy
3,564
408
468
940
2
Jessika Roswall
Environment
2,414
212
366
593
3
Henna Virkkunen
Digital / Tech Sovereignty
2,397
304
433
580
4
Valdis Dombrovskis
Economy & Simplification
1,676
138
325
412
5
Maria Luís Albuquerque
Financial Services
1,633
176
337
484
6
Maroš Šefčovič
Trade & Economic Security
1,584
104
295
457
7
Wopke Hoekstra
Climate & Clean Growth
1,550
212
207
477
8
Dan Jørgensen
Energy & Housing
1,543
167
213
482
9
Teresa Ribera
Clean, Just & Competitive Transition
1,051
110
168
367
10
Ekaterina Zaharieva
Startups, Research & Innovation
1,036
142
199
331
Ranked by an integrated score that weighs meeting volume, breadth of stakeholder network, and Commissioner-level involvement.
Commission side · the cabinet layer
The people behind the Commissioners
A large share of stakeholder access goes through cabinet members — not the Commissioner in person. These are the five individual staffers with the widest stakeholder reach across the College.
#
Cabinet member
Cabinet of
Score
Meetings
Unique stakeholders
1
Luis Planas Herrera
Roswall
583
198
234
2
Nicolò Brignoli
Dombrovskis
582
189
176
3
Arthur Corbin
Séjourné
567
247
340
4
Werner Stengg
Virkkunen
488
200
177
5
Elena Arveras
Albuquerque
409
155
149
Ranked by an integrated score that weighs meeting volume, breadth of stakeholder network, and independent meeting activity.
Arthur Corbin is the most prolific cabinet-level interlocutor of the mandate — 247 meetings and 340 unique stakeholders, wider than most Commissioners.
Parliament side · who stakeholders are meeting
The 10 most sought-after MEPs
Jun 2024 – Feb 2026
#
MEP
Country
Group
Score
Meetings
Unique stakeholders
1
Christian EHLER
DE
EPP
2,586
675
317
2
Andrea WECHSLER
DE
EPP
2,481
629
392
3
Peter LIESE
DE
EPP
2,300
570
342
4
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN
FI
ECR
2,215
742
531
5
Pascal CANFIN
FR
Renew
2,146
583
321
6
Eero HEINÄLUOMA
FI
S&D
2,015
620
402
7
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN
DK
Greens/EFA
1,940
506
248
8
Bruno TOBBACK
BE
S&D
1,887
480
352
9
Birgit SIPPEL
DE
S&D
1,648
487
255
10
Aura SALLA
FI
EPP
1,633
479
348
Ranked by an integrated score that weighs meeting volume, breadth of stakeholder network, and staff-level engagement.
EHLER (Competitiveness Fund + FP10) is the file-driven star. TYNKKYNEN leads on raw volume (742 meetings).
Parliament side · engagement by country
Meetings per MEP, by Member State
Finland
290
Denmark
172
Ireland
161
Germany
153
Luxembourg
138
Sweden
133
Netherlands
123
Belgium
123
Malta
112
Austria
102
Spain
94
France
92
Hungary
55
Italy
54
Romania
42
Poland
33
Greece
27
Finland punches far above its weight. NW European delegations dominate the top; Southern and Eastern delegations engage at a fraction of the rate.
Parliament side · engagement by political group
Meetings per MEP, by political group
Greens/EFA
158
Renew
149
S&D
109
EPP
104
The Left
68
ECR
56
Non-attached
40
PfE
29
ESN
14
Mainstream pro-EU groups dominate per-MEP engagement. The nationalist right is much less connected to the stakeholder ecosystem.
Parliament side · trade & business associations
Top 10 trade & business associations in MEP outreach
Jun 2024 – Mar 2026
#
Association
Sector
Total Interactions
Unique MEPs
Outreach Score
1
AmCham EU
Cross-sector (US business)
153
109
1,348
2
Copa-Cogeca
Agriculture & cooperatives
147
79
958
3
FuelsEurope
Oil refining
120
86
942
4
BUSINESSEUROPE
Cross-sector (EU business)
110
74
776
5
ACEA
Automotive
101
70
703
6
EuroCommerce
Retail & wholesale
83
69
629
7
EFPIA
Pharma
103
54
548
8
MPA EMEA
Film & audiovisual
71
64
539
9
SolarPower Europe
Solar energy
93
55
530
10
Cefic
Chemicals
98
53
525
What we'll cover today
Agenda
Part 1 · The horizontal agenda
EU competitiveness & security framing
Simplification wave — adopted, under discussion, to come
Omnibus package on sustainability / reporting requirementsadopted EP + Council
Omnibus on simplifying investment rulesadopted EP + Council
Omnibus on agricultureadopted EP + Council
… and more.
Simplification wave · still under discussion
Omnibuses in motion
Omnibus on defencein trilogues
Automotive package including revision of CO₂ targets EP: awaiting committee decisionCouncil: under examination370+ meetings
Omnibus on the chemical industry — Classification, Labelling and Packaging of substances, cosmetic products, fertilisers EP to adopt its position: set plenary date for 27/04Council: position adopted — shortens the phase-out period for cosmetics with CMR substances, removes the exemption based on oral or inhalation exposure, restores nanomaterial notification, and reinstates REACH registration for the most harmful fertiliser substances106 meetings
Omnibus on environmentEP: awaiting committee decisionCouncil: under examination
Digital omnibusEP: awaiting committee decisionCouncil: under examination
Digital omnibus on AIin trilogues102 meetings
Simplification wave · still to come in 2026
More omnibuses on the way
A second Chemicals Industry Package2026
A Climate package including a revision of national targets in the EU climate policy framework Q4 2026 — Effort Sharing Regulation + LULUCF
An Omnibus on taxationQ2 2026
An Omnibus on energy productsQ2 2026
… and more.
Public procurement
Public Procurement framework
UpcomingEC publication · Q2 2026~300 recorded stakeholder meetings
Aims to introduce qualitative criteria in public funding (e.g. sustainability, social, European preference).
MEP votes positions · EU policy on sustainability criteria in public funding
← Strict sustainability criteria
Market flexibility →
Public procurement · the "Buy European" fight
"Buy European" provisions
Protectionist factions (e.g. French) inside EPP and Renew are active and pushing for European preference quotas.
The broader rewrite of chemicals rules — REACH revision is the centerpiece — coming on top of the simplification package already moving through the institutions.
MEP votes positions · Chemicals regulation
← Strict regulation
Deregulation →
Environment · Chemicals Omnibus in motion
Simplification of chemical products
The "other" chemicals file already working through the institutions — the Classification, Labelling and Packaging / cosmetics / fertilisers simplification.
EP to adopt its position: set plenary date for 27/04Council: position adoptedCommittees ENVI & IMCO106 recorded stakeholder meetings
Where the Council landed
On cosmetic products — stronger safeguards for consumer safety (hazard communication, ingredient labelling, safety assessments)
On fertiliser products — stronger safeguards for environmental & agricultural safety, especially on the approval of new materials (incl. micro-organisms)
On Classification, Labelling and Packaging — accepts more of the simplification the Commission proposed (lighter compliance burden on industry: reduced labelling on small containers, digital labelling)
establish a Single Market for secondary raw materials
increase the supply of high-quality recycled materials and stimulate demand for these materials in the EU
Stakeholder activity already intense
over 800 feedbacks submitted through the Public Consultation · 552 documented meetings with 330 distinct organisations.
Most active voices include Zero Waste Europe, European Organisation for Packaging and the Environment, Municipal Waste Europe — a mix of circular-economy advocates, packaging industry and waste-management sector.
Sector · Energy
Legislative work intensifies in 2026
Focus is switching to energy security — infrastructure, connectivity, dependency, efficiency.
Energy · European Grids Package
Ongoing: European Grids Package
Published by EC in December 2025. 68 recorded stakeholder meetings on the package communication.
Trans-European energy infrastructure: guidelineslegislativeEP: awaiting committee decisionCouncil: under examination85 meetings
Acceleration of permit-granting procedureslegislativeEP: awaiting committee decisionCouncil: under examination
Energy · 2026 pipeline
Key upcoming proposals
Omnibus to simplify energy product legislationQ2 2026
Energy Union package for the decade ahead Q3 2026:
Development of the CO₂ transportation infrastructure and marketslegislative
Setting-up of the energy efficiency frameworklegislative
Setting-up of the renewable energy frameworklegislative
Sector · Transport & Automotive
Transport — the CO₂ fight drives the sector
A sector dominated by one defining fight: the automotive package and the 2035 internal-combustion-engine phase-out. Around it sit the adjacent files — end-of-life vehicles, animal transport, military mobility, air passenger rights, package travel.
We'll open on the automotive cleavage, then zoom out to the wider pipeline.
Transport · the automotive package
Automotive package — the CO₂ targets fight
EP: awaiting committee decisionCouncil: under examinationPart of the simplification wave370+ recorded stakeholder meetings on the automotive package
Revision of CO₂ emissions targets for vehicles — the battle over the 2035 ICE phase-out. The most vocal topic in transport: 132 MEPs have already spoken.
Projected view of where national governments stand on the revision of CO₂ standards.
Transport · adjacent files
Transport — the wider pipeline
Circularity requirements for vehicle design & end-of-life vehicles (REFIT) Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading (after trilogues)273 meetings
Protection of animals during transport and related operationsEP: awaiting cmte269 meetings
Framework on transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the UnionEP awaiting cmte42 meetings
Air passenger rightsAwaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading (after trilogues)57 meetings
Sector · Retail & Consumer
Retail & consumer — digital + product policy
Digital Fairness ActEC publication · Q4 2026 — targets dark patterns, online personalisation, influencer marketing 370 meetings
Sector · Health
Health — pharma track
Pharma package · from last term
Provisional agreement has been reached — awaiting formal adoption by the Council and the EP.
138 recorded stakeholder meetings across the two files (EMA governance + medicinal products for human use).
Critical Medicines Act · in trilogues
EP wants a more centralised role on stockpiles for the Commission, and supports joint procurement, compared to Council's mandate.
270+ recorded stakeholder meetings.
Health · Health Package (EC · Dec 2025)
Health Package — three files
Biotech ActlegislativeEP: preparatory phaseCouncil: under examination105 meetings on the INI report
Revised rules on medical and in vitro diagnostic deviceslegislativeEP: awaiting committee decisionCouncil: under examination96 meetings across the two files
Safe Hearts Plancommunication
Health · pharmaceuticals cleavage
Pharmaceuticals regulation
MEP votes positions · Pharmaceuticals regulation in EU
← Public-interest regulation
Market-friendly →
Sector · Digital
Digital — getting a lot of traction
Many proposals under discussion.
Digital
Digital Omnibus on AI
In triloguesCode 2025/0359(COD)Rapporteurs KOKALARI (EPP) + MCNAMARA (Renew)102 recorded stakeholder meetings
MEP votes positions · Artificial Intelligence
← Risk-based regulation
Innovation-first →
Digital · other ongoing files
Ongoing digital files
Digital omnibusEP: awaiting committee decisionCouncil: under examination
Cybersecurity Act RevisionEP: awaiting committee decisionCouncil: under examination83 meetings across the files
Digital Networks ActEP: preparatory phaseCouncil: under examination325+ meetings — one of the most engaged digital files
Digital · coming in 2026
Digital sovereignty & consumer protection
Cloud and AI Development Act and Chips ActEC publication · May 2026251 meetings already
Update of rules on audiovisual media servicesEC publication · Q3 202652 meetings
Digital Fairness ActEC publication · Q4 2026370 meetings
Sector · Agri-food
Agri-food — CAP at the centre, plus regulatory hot spots
The Common Agricultural Policy 2028–2034 is the headline file — and politically the most contested. Around it: simplification, imports, pesticides, animal welfare, and farmer position in the supply chain.
We'll walk through the cleavages file by file — CAP first.
Agri-food · CAP 2028–2034
Common Agricultural Policy 2028–2034
Code 2025/0241(COD)EP: awaiting committee decisionCouncil: under examinationRapporteur LINS (EPP)EP amendment deadline: 22 Apr 202670 recorded stakeholder meetings
MEP votes positions · CAP — competitiveness vs sustainability
← Sustainability focus
Competitiveness focus →
Agri-food · Ukraine imports cleavage
Agricultural trade — Ukraine imports
Rare file where left-wing and right-wing parties converge against the centrist pro-Ukraine position.
Key file: Simplification of food & feed safety requirements.
MEP votes positions · EU policy on pesticides
← Strict regulation
Deregulation →
Sector · Finance
Finance — Digital Euro headline, capital markets the deeper pipeline
Finance splits in two. The Digital Euro is the flagship — high-visibility, sharply political. Behind it sits the technical rewrite: capital-markets integration, sustainability disclosures, retail investor protection, securitisation, open finance — all moving in parallel.
We'll look at Digital Euro's cleavage first, then the broader finance pipeline.
Finance · Digital Euro
Digital Euro — left-right divide
Code 2023/0212(COD)OngoingRapporteur NAVARRETE ROJAS (EPP)ECON + LIBE389 recorded stakeholder meetings
MEP votes positions · Digital euro
← Support digital euro
Skeptical of digital euro →
Finance · other active files
Capital Markets · ESG disclosure · Banking Union
Capital markets integration — Master RegulationEP: Awaiting committee decision117 meetings
Retail investor protection rules (MiFID / PRIIPs amendment) Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading (after trilogues)77 meetings