navigate
Public Affairs Council

EU Policy Insights
April 2026

Presented by Doru P. Frantescu, founder and CEO of EU Matrix.

Note: the info presented is part of a new dashboard to be launched soon — feel free to contact us for early testing.

Scale of the VdL 2 Commission's legislative push

232 policy initiatives — and counting

167
Proposals already tabled
Pieces of legislation proposed so far
46
In the pipeline
Legislative initiatives planned (as of now)

The "Commission cannot do what national capitals don't allow" narrative is increasingly dated. The Commission has gone against Paris (Mercosur) and Berlin (chemicals & pollution).

Research dive · Commissioner Green Deal positioning

Is the College backing off the Green Deal?

430
statements analysed
Speeches, EP interventions, Green Deal passages

No Commissioner calls for dismantling the framework. But the College splits into four distinct postures — the language has shifted from climate leadership toward competitiveness, simplification, and calibration.

Research dive · four postures in the College

Four postures, 15 Commissioners

4
Active Advocates
Roswall · Ribera · Jørgensen · Kadis
Consistently champion green standards.
3
Strategic Supporters
Von der Leyen · Hoekstra · Lahbib
Back the agenda, frame it through competitiveness + geopolitics.
2
Passive Accepters
Tzitzikostas · Fitto
Administer green-adjacent programmes without advocacy or resistance.
6
Conditioners
Séjourné · Šefčovič · Hansen · Albuquerque · Dombrovskis · Várhelyi
Systematically argue to soften pace, scope or burden.
Research dive · the audience effect

The same Commissioner talks differently at different venues

The gap between a Commissioner's score at environmental conferences and at industry events measures the size of that adjustment.

How to read the score (−2 to +2 scale): +2 strongly championing green ambition · +1 supportive ·  0 conditional (accepts goals, argues to soften implementation) · −1 critical (argues to reduce scope) · −2 opposed (argues to dismantle)
Commissioner Env. conferences Industry events Gap
Ursula von der Leyen+2.0+0.21.8
Wopke Hoekstra+1.6+0.80.8
Jessika Roswall+1.7+1.20.5
Costas Kadis+1.4+1.20.2
Research dive · how the Green Deal is being justified

Sold as competitiveness — no longer as a climate response

The first von der Leyen Commission built its case on the climate crisis. This one builds it on competitiveness, resilience, independence. Across all 430 statements:

Economy 49%
Climate 32%
Geo 7%
Energy 6%
Social 6%

A policy sold as competitiveness is evaluated against economic outcomes — and becomes harder to defend the moment it imposes costs.

Stakeholders × EU decision-makers — scale of engagement

83,000+ stakeholder interactions

Stakeholders × Commission
21K+
interactions · VdL 2 mandate · until end Feb 2026
Interactions are derived from declared meetings (one meeting with multiple participants generates multiple interactions)
Stakeholders × MEPs
62K+
meeting pairs · 10th Parliament term · until end Feb 2026
662
MEPs engaged
rapporteurs, shadows, committee chairs and rank-and-file

Every one of these meetings is mapped to the files and topics discussed — so we can tell you which organisations have embedded themselves with the actors who shape your dossiers.

Commission side · who stakeholders are actually meeting

The 10 most sought-after Commissioners

Nov 2024 – Feb 2026
# Commissioner Portfolio Score Commissioner meetings Cabinet meetings Unique stakeholders
1Stéphane SéjournéIndustrial Strategy3,564408468940
2Jessika RoswallEnvironment2,414212366593
3Henna VirkkunenDigital / Tech Sovereignty2,397304433580
4Valdis DombrovskisEconomy & Simplification1,676138325412
5Maria Luís AlbuquerqueFinancial Services1,633176337484
6Maroš ŠefčovičTrade & Economic Security1,584104295457
7Wopke HoekstraClimate & Clean Growth1,550212207477
8Dan JørgensenEnergy & Housing1,543167213482
9Teresa RiberaClean, Just & Competitive Transition1,051110168367
10Ekaterina ZaharievaStartups, Research & Innovation1,036142199331

Ranked by an integrated score that weighs meeting volume, breadth of stakeholder network, and Commissioner-level involvement.

Commission side · the cabinet layer

The people behind the Commissioners

A large share of stakeholder access goes through cabinet members — not the Commissioner in person. These are the five individual staffers with the widest stakeholder reach across the College.

# Cabinet member Cabinet of Score Meetings Unique stakeholders
1Luis Planas HerreraRoswall583198234
2Nicolò BrignoliDombrovskis582189176
3Arthur CorbinSéjourné567247340
4Werner StenggVirkkunen488200177
5Elena ArverasAlbuquerque409155149

Ranked by an integrated score that weighs meeting volume, breadth of stakeholder network, and independent meeting activity.

Arthur Corbin is the most prolific cabinet-level interlocutor of the mandate — 247 meetings and 340 unique stakeholders, wider than most Commissioners.

Parliament side · who stakeholders are meeting

The 10 most sought-after MEPs

Jun 2024 – Feb 2026
# MEP Country Group Score Meetings Unique stakeholders
1Christian EHLERDEEPP2,586675317
2Andrea WECHSLERDEEPP2,481629392
3Peter LIESEDEEPP2,300570342
4Sebastian TYNKKYNENFIECR2,215742531
5Pascal CANFINFRRenew2,146583321
6Eero HEINÄLUOMAFIS&D2,015620402
7Kira Marie PETER-HANSENDKGreens/EFA1,940506248
8Bruno TOBBACKBES&D1,887480352
9Birgit SIPPELDES&D1,648487255
10Aura SALLAFIEPP1,633479348

Ranked by an integrated score that weighs meeting volume, breadth of stakeholder network, and staff-level engagement.

EHLER (Competitiveness Fund + FP10) is the file-driven star. TYNKKYNEN leads on raw volume (742 meetings).

Parliament side · engagement by country

Meetings per MEP, by Member State

Finland
290
Denmark
172
Ireland
161
Germany
153
Luxembourg
138
Sweden
133
Netherlands
123
Belgium
123
Malta
112
Austria
102
Spain
94
France
92
Hungary
55
Italy
54
Romania
42
Poland
33
Greece
27

Finland punches far above its weight. NW European delegations dominate the top; Southern and Eastern delegations engage at a fraction of the rate.

Parliament side · engagement by political group

Meetings per MEP, by political group

Greens/EFA
158
Renew
149
S&D
109
EPP
104
The Left
68
ECR
56
Non-attached
40
PfE
29
ESN
14

Mainstream pro-EU groups dominate per-MEP engagement. The nationalist right is much less connected to the stakeholder ecosystem.

Parliament side · trade & business associations

Top 10 trade & business associations in MEP outreach

Jun 2024 – Mar 2026
# Association Sector Total Interactions Unique MEPs Outreach Score
1AmCham EUCross-sector (US business)1531091,348
2Copa-CogecaAgriculture & cooperatives14779958
3FuelsEuropeOil refining12086942
4BUSINESSEUROPECross-sector (EU business)11074776
5ACEAAutomotive10170703
6EuroCommerceRetail & wholesale8369629
7EFPIAPharma10354548
8MPA EMEAFilm & audiovisual7164539
9SolarPower EuropeSolar energy9355530
10CeficChemicals9853525
What we'll cover today

Agenda

Part 1 · The horizontal agenda

  • EU competitiveness & security framing
  • Simplification wave — adopted, under discussion, to come
  • Public procurement revision
  • Post-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework

Part 2 · Sector by sector

  • Industry — Industrial Accelerator Act
  • Environment — Chemicals Package + Circular Economy
  • Energy — Grids Package + Energy Union 2026
  • Health — Critical Medicines + Health Package
  • Digital — CSAM, AI Omnibus, DNA, 2026 pipeline
  • Agri-food — CAP 2028–2034
Simplification wave · already finalised

Omnibuses adopted by both EP and Council

Simplification wave · still under discussion

Omnibuses in motion

Simplification wave · still to come in 2026

More omnibuses on the way

Public procurement

Public Procurement framework

Upcoming EC publication · Q2 2026 ~300 recorded stakeholder meetings

Aims to introduce qualitative criteria in public funding (e.g. sustainability, social, European preference).

MEP votes positions · EU policy on sustainability criteria in public funding
← Strict sustainability criteria
Market flexibility →
Public procurement · the "Buy European" fight

"Buy European" provisions

Protectionist factions (e.g. French) inside EPP and Renew are active and pushing for European preference quotas.

MEP votes positions · "Buy European" provisions · 717 MEPs scored
More influential →
← EU preference in procurement Equal treatment regardless of origin →
Each dot = one MEP. Hover for details.
Funding

Post-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework

270+ recorded stakeholder meetings across MFF files

Council aims to adopt by end of 2026 — fast track before the French presidential elections in April 2027.

European Parliament

  • Plenary vote on negotiating position planned for 29 April
  • Wants a 10% increase compared to the Commission's proposal
  • Wants to reverse cuts to CAP and cohesion

Council — yet to reach consensus on

  • Size of the budget
  • Priorities — new (competitiveness, digital, defence) vs. old (environment, agriculture, cohesion)
  • Introducing new own resources
  • Convergence vs competitiveness — CEE wants funds not to go solely to the most advanced countries
Sector · Industry

Industrial Accelerator Act

Code 2026/0068(COD) EP: preparatory phase Commissioner Séjourné DG GROW 326 recorded stakeholder meetings

Commission's flagship competitiveness proposal, already published.

Introduces "Made in EU" and low-carbon preferences in public procurement for steel, cement, aluminium, cars, and net-zero technologies.

Industrial Accelerator Act · where MEPs stand

The green-transition axis

How MEPs position on the green transition shapes how they'll read the Act's low-carbon preference clauses.

MEP votes positions · Energy (green transition)
← Accelerate transition
Preserve energy mix →
Sector · Environment

Legislative work intensifies in 2026

Key upcoming proposals:

Environment

Second Chemicals Industry Package

Upcoming EC publication · 2026 Commissioner Roswall DG ENV Includes REACH revision 92 recorded stakeholder meetings

The broader rewrite of chemicals rules — REACH revision is the centerpiece — coming on top of the simplification package already moving through the institutions.

MEP votes positions · Chemicals regulation
← Strict regulation
Deregulation →
Environment · Chemicals Omnibus in motion

Simplification of chemical products

The "other" chemicals file already working through the institutions — the Classification, Labelling and Packaging / cosmetics / fertilisers simplification.

EP to adopt its position: set plenary date for 27/04 Council: position adopted Committees ENVI & IMCO 106 recorded stakeholder meetings

Where the Council landed

Environment

A new Circular Economy Act

Upcoming EC publication target · Q3 2026 Commissioner Roswall DG ENV 552 recorded stakeholder meetings

Aims to:

Stakeholder activity already intense

over 800 feedbacks submitted through the Public Consultation · 552 documented meetings with 330 distinct organisations.

Most active voices include Zero Waste Europe, European Organisation for Packaging and the Environment, Municipal Waste Europe — a mix of circular-economy advocates, packaging industry and waste-management sector.

Sector · Energy

Legislative work intensifies in 2026

Focus is switching to energy security — infrastructure, connectivity, dependency, efficiency.

Energy · European Grids Package

Ongoing: European Grids Package

Published by EC in December 2025. 68 recorded stakeholder meetings on the package communication.

Energy · 2026 pipeline

Key upcoming proposals

Sector · Transport & Automotive

Transport — the CO₂ fight drives the sector

A sector dominated by one defining fight: the automotive package and the 2035 internal-combustion-engine phase-out. Around it sit the adjacent files — end-of-life vehicles, animal transport, military mobility, air passenger rights, package travel.

We'll open on the automotive cleavage, then zoom out to the wider pipeline.

Transport · the automotive package

Automotive package — the CO₂ targets fight

EP: awaiting committee decision Council: under examination Part of the simplification wave 370+ recorded stakeholder meetings on the automotive package

Revision of CO₂ emissions targets for vehicles — the battle over the 2035 ICE phase-out. The most vocal topic in transport: 132 MEPs have already spoken.

MEP votes positions · Automotive package — CO₂ targets
← Accelerate emissions standards
Relax / defend ICE →
Transport · national government positions

Council map — CO₂ standards for cars & vans

Projected view of where national governments stand on the revision of CO₂ standards.

Transport · adjacent files

Transport — the wider pipeline

Sector · Retail & Consumer

Retail & consumer — digital + product policy

Sector · Health

Health — pharma track

Pharma package · from last term

Provisional agreement has been reached — awaiting formal adoption by the Council and the EP.

138 recorded stakeholder meetings across the two files (EMA governance + medicinal products for human use).

Critical Medicines Act · in trilogues

EP wants a more centralised role on stockpiles for the Commission, and supports joint procurement, compared to Council's mandate.

270+ recorded stakeholder meetings.

Health · Health Package (EC · Dec 2025)

Health Package — three files

Health · pharmaceuticals cleavage

Pharmaceuticals regulation

MEP votes positions · Pharmaceuticals regulation in EU
← Public-interest regulation
Market-friendly →
Sector · Digital

Digital — getting a lot of traction

Many proposals under discussion.

Digital

Digital Omnibus on AI

In trilogues Code 2025/0359(COD) Rapporteurs KOKALARI (EPP) + MCNAMARA (Renew) 102 recorded stakeholder meetings
MEP votes positions · Artificial Intelligence
← Risk-based regulation
Innovation-first →
Digital · other ongoing files

Ongoing digital files

Digital · coming in 2026

Digital sovereignty & consumer protection

Sector · Agri-food

Agri-food — CAP at the centre, plus regulatory hot spots

The Common Agricultural Policy 2028–2034 is the headline file — and politically the most contested. Around it: simplification, imports, pesticides, animal welfare, and farmer position in the supply chain.

We'll walk through the cleavages file by file — CAP first.

Agri-food · CAP 2028–2034

Common Agricultural Policy 2028–2034

Code 2025/0241(COD) EP: awaiting committee decision Council: under examination Rapporteur LINS (EPP) EP amendment deadline: 22 Apr 2026 70 recorded stakeholder meetings
MEP votes positions · CAP — competitiveness vs sustainability
← Sustainability focus
Competitiveness focus →
Agri-food · Ukraine imports cleavage

Agricultural trade — Ukraine imports

Rare file where left-wing and right-wing parties converge against the centrist pro-Ukraine position.

MEP votes positions · Agricultural trade: Ukraine imports
← Open trade with Ukraine
Protect EU farmers →
Agri-food · pesticides cleavage

EU policy on pesticides

Key file: Simplification of food & feed safety requirements.

MEP votes positions · EU policy on pesticides
← Strict regulation
Deregulation →
Sector · Finance

Finance — Digital Euro headline, capital markets the deeper pipeline

Finance splits in two. The Digital Euro is the flagship — high-visibility, sharply political. Behind it sits the technical rewrite: capital-markets integration, sustainability disclosures, retail investor protection, securitisation, open finance — all moving in parallel.

We'll look at Digital Euro's cleavage first, then the broader finance pipeline.

Finance · Digital Euro

Digital Euro — left-right divide

Code 2023/0212(COD) Ongoing Rapporteur NAVARRETE ROJAS (EPP) ECON + LIBE 389 recorded stakeholder meetings
MEP votes positions · Digital euro
← Support digital euro
Skeptical of digital euro →
Finance · other active files

Capital Markets · ESG disclosure · Banking Union

Presented by Doru P. Frantescu, founder and CEO of EU Matrix.

Note: the info presented is part of a new dashboard to be launched soon — feel free to contact us for early testing.

Public Affairs Council

EU Policy Insights
April 2026