Do’s and Don’ts for Using AI in Advocacy
September 2026
The rise of AI tools and platforms creates exciting possibilities for public affairs professionals.
These tools promise new ways to target constituents, help them tell their stories authentically and at scale, and collaborate with elected leaders on legislative solutions.
As with any tool, AI isn’t a silver bullet. Using AI to scale strategies that weren’t working before won’t suddenly make them effective.
“Balance is the key,” says Laura Brigandi, senior manager of advocacy practice at the Public Affairs Council. “You want to make the process as quick and easy as possible for the advocate without sacrificing the personalization that shows a congressional office there’s a real constituent behind the message.”
We compiled some do’s and don’ts for advocacy professionals who want to use AI for better outcomes. Use these tips for more successful advocacy campaigns — while avoiding common mistakes.
Do: Prioritize authenticity over volume.
Congressional offices receive tens of thousands of emails a day. Many of those are identical form letters. Even if they’re not astroturf, it’s hard for Hill staffers to know if those constituents actually care passionately about your issue and its outcome.
“It’s more relevant to get 60 separate, organic, typo-laden messages than 700 generic messages, all the same down to the punctuation point,” says a former Hill staffer we spoke to.
Instead, use AI tools to shift from quantity to quality. New AI features can help constituents tell their story more authentically and with confidence because they use AI to “interview” the advocate, then generate a message with their authentic story at its core. The resulting letter isn’t identical to hundreds of others, and the advocate has played a more active role in sharing their story with their elected leader.
“AI flips the traditional model,” says Chazz Clevinger, CEO of CiviClick, a platform that specializes in helping organizations use their authentic voice when leveraging AI. “From one letter multiplied 10,000 times to 10,000 people telling their own true stories.”
Don’t: Do anything without your advocates’ consent.
If you plan to use AI tools to generate letters or stories for your advocates, be sure to give them the ability to opt in to assistance from AI tools. Don’t send anything in their name that they haven’t reviewed and approved.
“Use AI as a ghostwriter, not a fabricator,” warns Clevinger. “Real person, real consent, real story — the technology just helps them tell it well.”
Don’t use AI to autogenerate constituent communications or flood legislative inboxes. Even a small number of false stories or fake advocates can harm the reputation of an entire campaign.
“Many elected officials respond to constituent communications, even if it’s just a form letter,” says Brigandi. “When a staffer follows up and the constituent has no knowledge of sending a message, it’s a real red flag to the office.”
Do: Use AI for more than just letter writing.
As AI tools gain sophistication, think beyond drafting content to using AI for better timing and targeting. Policy intelligence tools can now watch bill movement across Congress and in all 50 states. These tools can then identify and target the right slice of your audience as soon as a bill is introduced, a committee vote gets scheduled or a bill moves to the floor.
Even small government relations teams can now monitor legislation more widely, move more quickly and ensure that the right constituents are activated at the right time. “AI can help teams quickly synthesize legislative and regulatory developments, news, stakeholder activity and other signals to identify patterns or emerging issues they might otherwise miss,” says Mike MacKay, head of Bloomberg Government. “The real advantage comes when it gives experienced professionals more time and better context to exercise their judgment — to understand what a development means, where it may be headed and where their organization can have an impact.”
The former Hill staffer also suggested that advocates use an AI partner to learn about the legislative process and prepare for their meetings with elected officials. Your advocates will have more realistic expectations for what’s possible, and constituent meetings can be more productive and collaborative.
Don’t: Use AI to scale strategies that weren’t working.
The introduction of these new tools presents an opportunity to rethink advocacy strategy rather than doing the same old thing at a higher volume.
The most successful advocacy professionals will use AI to test out new strategies, collaborating with AI tools rather than ignoring them entirely.
As Hill staff grapple with escalating volumes of constituent mail, using AI to simply increase the number of messages won’t move the needle. Similarly, using AI to produce more materials for in-person meetings that will take staff more time to read, understand and act on is counterproductive.
“The goal was never more messages,” says Clevinger. “It was more citizens genuinely heard. Avoid set-and-forget deployments where nobody is watching what the AI says on your behalf.”
Before adding AI to a campaign, identify the problem you are trying to solve. Are advocates struggling to personalize messages? Are the barriers to sending a message too high? If the organization cannot identify the constraint, adding AI may simply accelerate an ineffective process.
Do: Use AI for message segmentation and analysis.
AI can help advocacy teams analyze past campaign activity and identify patterns that might otherwise be difficult to spot. By looking at factors such as advocates’ locations, interests and previous engagement, these tools can help determine which audiences are most likely to respond to a particular issue and what type of action or message may resonate with them. This allows organizations to send more relevant communications instead of treating every advocate — and every legislative moment — the same.
Teams can also use AI to make sense of information gathered during a campaign. It can surface recurring themes across advocate stories, survey responses, meeting notes and open-ended feedback; identify common questions or concerns; and summarize what advocates are hearing from policymakers. These insights can help teams refine their messaging and determine where additional education, outreach or follow-up may be needed.
Don’t: Mistake AI output for expertise.
Be sure a person is always reviewing and vetting any strategy, research or materials generated by AI. These models are increasing in sophistication and accuracy every day — but they’re still known to make things up or include telltale tics or “AI-isms.”
Legislative staffers are increasingly attuned to content that is AI generated and might be more likely to discount it or at least question its authenticity. Ensure that constituent communications still sound like the person sending them, even after AI assistance.
Use AI to build trust, not break it. “You don’t want to squander your opportunity with bad numbers,” says the former Hill staffer. That’s why it’s critical to verify all facts, citations and legislative details for accuracy, and to confirm that the output correctly reflects the organization’s position. Consider it nonnegotiable to hold yourself personally accountable for everything AI produces for your advocacy campaign. Don’t outsource the research without fact checking. Make sure the final product is something you’re proud of.
“
The most successful advocacy professionals will use AI to test out new strategies, collaborating with AI tools rather than ignoring them entirely.
More News & Resources
We’re bringing together experts and practitioners from across industries for discussions on emerging issues affecting local, state and federal government relations professionals.